SVG

Lawyer wants Sen. Frederick disciplined

Vynnette Frederick was the New Democratic Party’s candidate in West St. George (File photo: Oris Robinson).

KINGSTOWN, St. Vincent – A lawyer who represented Prime Minster Dr. Ralph Gonsalves in an election-related matter is considering asking Attorney General Judith Jones-Morgan to institute disciplinary proceedings against opposition lawmaker, Sen. Vynnette Frederick, a lawyer.

Frederick last week failed in the Court of Appeal to have the decision of a lower court overturned in relations to statements Gonsalves made during the campaign for the 2010 election, which she said affected her performance at the poll.

The legal proceedings related to Gonsalves’ saying that Frederick’s father “send a daughter to study law, and came back and get a son, … a tomboy”.

Frederick’s lawyers argued that Gonsalves was referring to their client’s sexual orientation and this affected the vote in West St. George, where she lost to Cecil “Ces” McKie of Gonsalves’ Unity Labour Party (ULP).

But Dominican Senior Counsel Anthony Astaphan pointed to inconsistencies in the contents of documents Frederick submitted to the court, including the word “lesbian”, which she said was inadvertently inserted in a transcript of a recording of Gonsalves comments.

“This insistency on her [part] on the 23rd of May that she heard the word ‘lesbian’ — after we wrote in December, after Stephen Williams sort with the affidavit exhibiting the transcript showing clearly that the word ‘lesbian’ was not used — is something that I find that we have to take very seriously,” Astaphan said on radio on Friday.

“Although we won the appeal and the matter is now at an end, we are seriously considering raising the matter with the Director of Public Prosecutions [Colin Williams] because we think it must have constituted a criminal offence and we are also thinking very seriously of taking up the matter with the Attorney General with a view to having disciplinary proceeding instituted against Vynnette Frederick for that sort of behaviour,” he said.

Dominican Senior Counsel Anthony Astaphan.

“We cannot allow lawyers who are politicians or politicians who are lawyers to deliberately mislead the court in material aspects in order to try to score a victory in the court for political gain. It is for me an unacceptable crossing of the line,” he said.

Frederick’s complaint, was among several filed by members of the opposition New Democratic Party, which won seven of the 15 parliamentary seats in 2010 while the incumbent ULP won eight, and was returned to office.

The complaints were filed under the Representation of the People Act, under which anyone convicted of an offence is barred from voting or being a member of the House of Assembly for five years.

If the ruling had gone against Gonsalves or any other government area representatives, they would have resulted in a fall of the ULP administration and fresh elections.

Follow our FeedFollow on FacebookFollow on Twitter

Advertisements

Discussion

36 thoughts on “Lawyer wants Sen. Frederick disciplined

  1. The DPP bias?

    Posted by John | June 5, 2012, 00:43
  2. Members of the NDP are such sore losers that they will try to use anything ( even dishonesty) to topple the ULP administration. This is dispicable. NDP , you LOST the last election. When will you guys accept this?.. Take it like a man and try to come better in 2015 please. These foolish attempts to overturn the democratically elected ULP administrstion are not working. It only make you guys look like a desperate, power-hungry bunch and it will result in you loosing some of the seats you have nnow. And Vynette , Shame on you. I cant stand lawyers who try to use the law to trick people. You have a daughter. Is this the kind of way you want to raise her?

    Posted by AB | June 5, 2012, 07:22
  3. Vynette Frederick should be barred from PRACTICING LAW.

    By the way, now that Linton is a SENATOR, is he still eligible to be the PRESIDENT of the BAR ASSOCIATION?

    Posted by VINCY POWA (@VINCYPOWA) | June 5, 2012, 09:23
  4. This girl ain’t tired making herself look foolish? Oh I forgot,it’s a ndp thing.lol

    Posted by Jason | June 5, 2012, 11:41
    • WAIT A MINUTE…SO FOLLOWING JASON THE RACIST, LOGIC….HE IS NDP… AND SO IS THE DIMWITTED, VINCYPOWA? DAMN!!!

      Posted by Saadiss | June 5, 2012, 15:04
  5. This is a very sad situation indeed. The party needs to look seriously at what is happening and make some real tough decisions. we cannot contiune to play games, we do not have the time for these kinds of distractions.

    Posted by Mourine | June 5, 2012, 13:20
  6. Frederick’s father “send a daughter to study law, and came back and get a son, … a tomboy”.

    “WTF” allyo think Gunzzie was referring to? Wasn’t Gunzzie insinuating that Frederick, who is a female, was a male
    ( tomboy)?… WTF is that? Did Frederick had a sex change? If not, WTF was he talking about? All yo tell “ASSTOFAN” watch he ask he ha tie in SVG yo know! he nah gwine always have ULP as a stake.

    Let this “A**hole” explain what Gunzzie meant by his remarks. WTF was Gunziee referring to? If he knows for sure that Gunzee was not reffering to lesbeanism, tell we WTF Gunzee was talking ’bout. So what! Venette who is a female is called a male by this country’s PM and she commit an offence because she object to this? WTF…… we living is a communist state? When PM Gunzie insunated that Armin was a homo in his remarks and connection with Kenlyn, allyo jump up and clap. Now, allyo want to jail Vennie because she concluded that Ralph was insunating that she is a lesbian! All you so … -backward that all yo gwine now pretend that all yo don’t know what Gunzee was talking ’bout. What is the explanation for Gunzee’s remarks? WHAT EXACTLY WAS HE TRYING TO SAY?

    All yo go ahead, one of these days all yo gwine climb the wrong tree in this ya country. Some all yo gwine hold all yo head and bawl yo know. A tell allyo, all yo lucky we nah living in Jamdown or one ah them “rawthtid country” If I had the power, I will line all you up and pelt allyo with this same sh*t all you trying to gee we……. HYPOCRITES!!

    Posted by AHA | June 5, 2012, 13:59
    • @ AHA, if you are going to quote the man quote him correctly….The quote was : ” It would be unfortunate if her father sent away a daughter and got back a son , a tomboy”…he did not say it happened…he said it would be unfortunate IF it happened…..hugeeeee difference…You cant take insinustions into the court room…you have to take FACTS……

      Posted by proud vincy | June 6, 2012, 10:22
  7. WE ALL KNOW GONSALVES SAID IT, AND I BELIEVE WHAT HE SAID DAMAGED HER STANDING. IT IS MY OPINION THAT WE CANNOT TRUST THE CARIBBEAN JUDICIARY AT ANY LEVEL.

    Posted by Peter | June 5, 2012, 15:18
    • Hey Peter if the court had ruled in favour of the NDP folks then we could have trusted then right?

      Posted by proud vincy | June 6, 2012, 10:24
  8. If you are so indebted there’s a possiblity that you can be bought,you shouldn’t be attorney general,Why ralfy complain bout campbell sup but not about captain morgan rum…If nanoo popped back up and offered to pay the mortgages of certain people he could own de justice system

    Posted by Joe | June 5, 2012, 20:23
  9. Vynette needs to return the favour by going to the dominica attorney general with statements Gloria estephan made during our elections,or someone in the ndp needs to file suit against miss estephan,so she’ll think twice b4 interfering in our affairs or getting paid by vincentian tax money, Isn’t Blazer Williams, etc good enuff fo de comrade?How could you be pro-vincentian when you go to a foreign layer every second?

    Posted by Jahu | June 5, 2012, 20:35
  10. AHA, are you VINCENTIAN?

    You do not know what is a TOM BOY in VINCY SOCIETY or in most SOCIETIES?

    I remember this GIRL who used to climb mango trees better than most boys. She was a TOM BOY. Today, she is HAPPILY MARRIED and have 5 kids.

    I can give you more examples of girls I grew up with who were TOM BOYS and they’re all MARRIED or SINGLE with kids.

    Maybe in your time the TOM BOYS grew up to be something DIFFERENT. However, those in my time all grew up to be women with children.

    Posted by VINCYPOWA | June 6, 2012, 00:23
  11. How you could fly vincy lawyer fo represent camilloo in new york but you flyin dominican lawyer here fo represent you?Why yo nah fly gloria estephan new york let she talk she racist nonsense bout obama et al and get kicked out de country,mek we haffu listen she every minute?

    Posted by Jahu | June 6, 2012, 07:25
  12. Astaphan head shine in de picture,ah wonder if he does use Pledge?

    Posted by Joe | June 6, 2012, 07:28
  13. Amazing eh!! When you win “justice is served”, when you lose “we can’t trust the Caribbean Justice System”. Imagine these people in Government, Lord help us!!!!

    Posted by no-nonsense | June 6, 2012, 07:33
  14. We await your confirmation on availability.

    Astaphan specializes in the protection of communist scum throughout the Caribbean. He is disliked immensely in his own country and in many Caribbean islands.

    Astaphan is an ex-student of Gonsalves. He has earned huge fees over the last ten years from the Gonsalves regime, both for ULP government work and for Gonsalves personally generated litigation. No one knows if Gonsalves has paid any part of Astaphan’s fees or if its all paid from the government coffers.

    We are talking about many more times than a Vincentian can earn in a lifetime.

    As for disciplining Frederick, that would just prove how tuned into anti freedom of human rights this government is. Here we have an educated man like Gonsalves saying dreadful things about someone, and I doubt that he didn’t know it would damage her standing, in fact I believe it was done purposely just for that reason. And you want to punish the person who was damaged by Gonsalves.

    Then she is subjected to the law according to Astaphan, with the hope of gagging her forever.

    This is just another nasty example of Gonsalves spite.

    What you can be sure of, if someone had told a story of a Gonsalves gay encounter as a boy, he would of sued everyone and every media out of sight.

    Posted by Peter | June 6, 2012, 08:16
  15. Y’all does really crack me up on this blog. “AHA” the person making the claim couldn’t even present the evidence to substantiate. Even Frank Da silva went on radio and said that the Vinnie was trying to deceive the courts because he is the one who gave them the tapes so I aint see your point. You people are so blinded by hatred that ignorance fuels your everyday thoughts. The local courts trow out the case, the appeal court trow it out as well. If you all really believe they bias then take it to the privy council.

    Posted by John | June 6, 2012, 09:16
    • JOHN.. YOU GOTTA BE JOKING RIGHT? WE NAH KAY WHAT FRANK SAY…. ALL AH WE KNOW WHAT THE PM WAS TRYING TO IMPLY BY HIS STATEMENTS. NO AMOUNT AH EXCUSE GWINE NULLIFY WHAT HE WAS TRYING TO SAY. ALL”YO TOO HYPOCRITE. WHEN WE SAY AH MAN IS “FUNNY” WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF HIS SEXUALLITY WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? EH? All yO REALLY BELIEVE PEOPLE ARE AS*ES WITH ALL THIS BULLSH*T DISHONESTY.

      Posted by AHA | June 6, 2012, 12:20
      • @ AHA, stop being a dumba** nah…we are talking about a court of law….you go in a court of law with facts that can be substatiated…You cant go in with insinustions and stuff that cannnot be proven….you think this is a roadside gossip crew?..be wise please

        Posted by proud vincy | June 6, 2012, 13:15
  16. Ralph Gonsalves has mashed up this country with his pettiness, dshonesty, spitefulness, immorality, incapability- the whole non beneficial works.

    Posted by justice | June 6, 2012, 14:49
  17. Powa estaphan needs to be disciplined,ralph needs to put estaphan in his lap,pull down his pants and spank him,”Bad Estephan,Bad Estephan” l.o.l

    Posted by Joe | June 6, 2012, 21:36
  18. JOE, Astaphan head shiny because its treated with extract of Gonslaveshitbigbucksonthetable, this is a Germanic word, and can be applied to any bald Syrian headlikedick, not just Astaphan.

    Works pretty well eh! even his mummy would consider loving him now.

    Posted by Peter | June 8, 2012, 08:38
  19. Try doing this, put into your search engine the following ‘Anthony Astaphan, Dominica, disliked, hated, nasty’
    In fact search Astaphan in all directions on the internet, to get a real insite into the man.

    Posted by Peter | June 8, 2012, 08:51
  20. JAHU, ah carn curls dem eat with it?

    Posted by STEVE_HUGGINS | June 8, 2012, 09:28
  21. Do u ppl know anything about this case?!?
    Vynette SWORE an affidavit to the court. She told the court she was QUOTING Ralph DIRECTLY and she SWORE that Ralph used the word LESBIAN in the meeting. When u listen 2 d tape, Ralph didn’t say the word lesbian.
    Whether or not “tomboy” means “lesbian” is a different case. That aint the case Vynette bring to court.
    She bring a case to court saying Ralph call she a LESBIAN directly.
    Vynette had the tape. She listened to the tape. She transcribed the tape. And when she transcribed the tape, she ADDED IN the word “lesbian” – she put words in Ralph mouth
    It is a CRIME for a lawyer to enter false evidence into court. If your client go in the court and lie, well, that’s, life. But if a LAWYER, an OFFICER of the court, SWEARS to something she knwos is FALSE, that’s a crime.
    Look it up.
    So that’s why they talking about discipline her. Cuz she broke the rules of a lawyer and committed perjury.
    Just like she broke the rules when she tek out her camera in court and tek photos of Luke Browne in the dock and post them on Facebook. Just like she did when she take the camera out in parliament against the rules of the house.
    Vynette playing lawyer. She playing senator. But she don’t know the rules of either game.

    Posted by Safia | June 8, 2012, 10:39
  22. The judgment was based on the erroneous evidence presented. You cannot do things like this and get away with it, it can cost you your career.

    Posted by Mourine | June 8, 2012, 14:32
  23. YOUTUBE VIDEO
    Anthony Astaphan the mad liar
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLVQA-5u6VA

    Article
    “His insatiable appetite for lies has landed him before the very Court in which he is a senior advocate on charges of deliberatly manufacturing statements to defame people he does not like“.
    http://honestdominica.com/357/if-lies-could-kill

    Blogged Article
    How many times must this liar be caught.
    http://lists.dominica-my-opinion.com/pipermail/dominica/Week-of-Mon-20110221/001757.html

    Article
    “Attorney of rogue administration in Dominica and the most-controversial and dubious Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit has been lately caught red-handed, when attorney Anthony Astaphan, fabricated an email and sent the same with the ulterior motive of blackmailing the editor of Weekly Blitz“.
    http://www.cakafete.com/up-to-date-news/885-inside-dominica-attorney-caught-red-handed-in-forgery-ii.html

    https://www.google.com/#q=Anthony+Astaphan,+lied+to+the+court&start=10&hl=en&sa=N&prmd=imvnso&source=univ&tbm=vid&tbo=u&psj=1&ei=lVbTT5acO-mo0QXN0MCtBA&ved=0CF4QqwQ4Cg&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=41799eea8a5c97a3&biw=1024&bih=562

    Posted by Peter | June 9, 2012, 10:03
  24. There is a saying, “SET A CROOK TO CATCH A CROOK” can anyone explain what that means?

    Posted by Peter | June 9, 2012, 10:05
  25. SAFIA, is it possible that any of the tapes were doctored, items added or even removed? Is there any chance that someine fabricated the Frederick or ULP tape and transcript?

    Posted by Peter | June 9, 2012, 10:10
  26. it’s much, much, WORSE to be accused of being a FORCIBLE RAPIST – – – and that by OFFICERS OF THE LAW/ COURT . . . .

    Posted by STEVE_HUGGINS | June 10, 2012, 17:41
  27. The thing here is we do not know for sure what went down in this issue. We do not know who was wrong or who was right because the matter never went to trail. The accused had a very good chance at a Civil suite but chose not to so can we really say for sure the accustion was correct?

    Posted by Mourine | June 11, 2012, 14:04
  28. The thing here is we do not know for sure what went down in this issue. We do not know who was wrong or who was right because the matter never went to trail. The accused had a very good chance at a Civil suit but chose not to so can we really say for sure the accusation was correct?

    Posted by Mourine | June 11, 2012, 14:07
  29. MOURINE, it is broadly believed by the people that the police woman was bought off by Gonsalves. All I know is that Gonsalves is a prolific litigator, if the woman lied on Gonsalves he would of sued her out of sight. He has been silent on the matter and has taken no action against her.

    Mourine we were told by the DPP there were 5 complaints against Gonsalves by different women, the DPP disallowed all.

    Posted by Peter | June 12, 2012, 13:18

I-Witness News’ tweets

Archives

%d bloggers like this: