SVG

Opposition ‘will do no differently’ from gov’t – fired senator

NDP ignored complaints about an opposition legislator’s “behaviour in public with a woman who is not his wife.” – Anesia Baptiste

Former senator Anesia Baptiste, pictured here in 2009, said that the NDP’s policy regarding its members and comments about religion “amounts to a similar attack on constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms” that she opposed during the 2009 referendum campaign (Photo: Oris Robinson).

KINGSTOWN, St. Vincent — Opposition Leader Arnhim Eustace last Thursday fired Anesia Baptiste from the senate but she left behind an 11-page letter that said an opposition New Democratic Party (NDP) policy on religion suggested that, in office, the NDP “will do no differently from the ULP (Unity Labour Party) in persecuting persons for their rights and freedoms”.

She further questioned what an NDP government led by Eustace would not do to remain in power. Such a government, she said, would move against public servant in much the same way that the ULP administration, headed by Dr. Ralph Gonsalves, in 2010 slapped her with 16 charges for statements she made during the 2009 referendum campaign, when she was a public servant.

Baptiste, in her April 17 letter, said that the NDP leadership seeks to “limit the freedom of speech of morally upright and hard working members” of the party but did not formulate policies on “more serious issues” even as it ignored complaint about the public behaviour of some opposition parliamentary and potential election candidates.

According to Baptiste, she learnt of the NDP’s policy on adverse comments on religions after Eustace told a meeting of party leaders last week that he was unhappy with statements on radio by Shefflorn Ballantyne, who has indicated an interest in representing the NDP in North Windward, come next general election.

The NDP’s policy that no candidate or potential candidate should make publicly statements that are adverse to any religion contradicts the constitutions of both the country and the party, she said.

“… tell me Mr. Eustace, how can your party, which hopes to take office to govern all of SVG under the … Constitution of SVG, which protects Vincentians freedom to believe and express their religious teaching privately and publicly … justify taking a policy position that in effect limits its candidates and potential candidates’ freedom of speech in religious liberty?” Baptiste asked in her 11-page, 5,000-word letter.

“And tell me sir, how will you guarantee these freedoms with their scope constitutionally, if you take governance in SVG, when, now while in opposition, you dare to limit the scope of your members and candidates’ legitimate freedoms?”

‘out of place attempt’

She described as an “out of place attempt to limit God-given and constitutionally protected freedoms” the NDP’s policy on statements about religion, and said the only reason given for the policy “is the claim that it will damage the party”.

Baptiste said that Eustace was “seriously mistaken” in that belief.

“If you seek to limit our freedom of speech now, claiming it is not politically advantageous to the party’s aim of gaining government, what will you do if you get into office and your sole interest then is to keep government? Will not keeping government be a higher stake that attaining it?” Baptiste asked.

“… Is it not safe to infer that you will have the tendency to limit your ministers’ freedoms then? How will public servants who wish to be constructively critical of your government fare, when that criticism can ‘hurt’ or ‘damage’ your government, in the same way you argue that public statements averse to religion can ‘hurt’ or ‘damage’ your party now?” Baptiste said.

“Do you realize the implications of what you are saying? My ultimate question is what will become of an Anesia Baptiste public servant under your government if this is your policy now in the NDP in Opposition? Have you forgot what I suffered and why? The Prime Minister was under pressure by his members to ‘deal with’ me because of my pronouncements during the referendum. He did and the rest is history,” Baptiste said.

She said she “fought for protection of inalienable rights and freedoms which were under threat in the proposed constitution bill 2009” and “suffered persecution” because of her stance.

“Now I am shocked to hear you espouse and dictate to the party a policy which amounts to a similar attack on constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms and which when followed to its logical conclusion can result in the same victimization and persecution of persons who may, just following their convictions, make public statements which you do not consider helpful to your political advantage,” Baptiste wrote.

She asked if the NDP did not have “more serious issues to be making policies on in meetings”. She added: “Is not the ULP doing much in this country to destroy people’s lives?”

Baptiste said the position adopted by Eustace “is a backward and debilitating one for the NDP and I am obliged in my conscience to tell you so without water in my mouth”.

NDP ignored complaints about party members 

The NDP meeting on Tuesday, she said, did not respond to her concern that “matters of complaint about candidates’ public behaviour” are not beign discussed by the party.

According to Baptiste, she has received calls about an opposition legislator’s “behaviour in public with a woman who is not his wife” and complaints against the public behaviour of a potential candidate in North Windward “regarding his female partner”.

“I believe you have received these complaints also. There are other complains too, such as about upset and confusion in East St. George between and among former council member, the current candidate and supporters.

“Has any investigation been done into these things? Or is there no need for any? Will there be policy positions dictated on these issues also? Will they be brought into similar meeting like today, in each person’s absence, like what was done today also? Or do they not hurt the party?

“How far are you prepared to go, sir? These things warrant attention. Is there unfair discrimination when it comes to Ballantyne? Why single out his innocent statement for address? Is there hypocrisy? It seems it would be better if Ballantyne had stoned a church like another candidate and nothing would be done about it,” Baptiste said, a swipe at West Kingstown representative Dnaiel Cummings, who had stoned a church before he entered politics.

Baptiste, who has said that she wants to be the nation’s first woman prime minister, said that it was “disappointing, unacceptable and leaves much to be desired” that the policy on religion had come from Eustace, a former prime minister.

“I fear that if you are taking such a position now in opposition you will be a danger to Vincentians’ rights and freedoms as leader of government. It is in fact the policy position that you dictated today that will hurt the party’s position of getting into office. And if the NDP really holds policies like this it will do no differently from the ULP in persecuting persons for their rights and freedoms,” she said.

Baptiste said that she is “a democrat” and “will stand — as I have always stood — for the protection of the inalienable and constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms of all people, including and especially minorities.”

She siad this is “the true test of the character of policy makers and governments.

“This is the real yard stick by which governments are to be judged — how they treat the God-given rights and freedoms of the people. I will not be the hypocrite, not then, not now and not ever. This is who I am, this is what I stand by, based on the word of God,” she said, quoting 16th century German Reformer Martin Luther, who siad, “… to go against conscience is neither right nor safe. I cannot and I will not recant. Here I stand. I can do no other. So help me God.”

“… when I joined the NDP, it was because I believed that the party had respect for rights and freedoms of all Vincentians, those in the party and those in government, unlike the tyranny of the ULP. I placed a lot of trust in the ideals of this party and hoped that through its policies we will see a new politics, a new beginning, a golden age for St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Please do not hurt me so much by disappointing me. Please do not make me feel that I have misjudged this party,” Baptiste said in her letter.

Follow our FeedFollow on FacebookFollow on Twitter

Advertisements

Discussion

21 thoughts on “Opposition ‘will do no differently’ from gov’t – fired senator

  1. I seriously believe this woman has a legitimate shot at being SVG’s first female PM.

    Posted by Enigma | April 23, 2012, 06:15
  2. OH HO SO ARHNIM IS A TYRANT? I KNEW IT ALL ALONG

    Posted by F.U.D.Z. | April 23, 2012, 11:30
  3. I am sorry to see her leave, but i must say that it was wrong of her to condemn other people’s religion. Religion shouldn’t be allowed in politics, notice i said religion, and not God. Her religion seems to be a new one, and she should have had more restraint than that. I was born into Adventise, but they practice somethings that are not in the bible and Catholics too, with their praying to mother Mary and other stuff that are not supported by the bible. But as a person in such a high position it doesn’t give anyone the right to condemn anyone’s religion in St Vincent, when we pray to the same God. I wish her all the best, but you have to be more responsible in those stations.And the letter than she wrote, as I understood, had nothing to do with the constitution, she was also reaching a bit about being dictated too.

    However i also did not support Mr. Eustace decision to make such an announcement on radio before telling her first hand. She contributed a lot to the party and no matter what happened, she should have been informed better than that. Maybe she should make her own party and shake up politics in St Vincent. Because this NDP vs Labor thing has been going on for too long. Our country is going down the crapper and people are still talking nonsense about “we nar tun back”. Vincy need another party to compete for the people’s vote, we need more choice in this Country.

    Posted by blane | April 23, 2012, 11:39
    • Blane, I believe she knew that she was going to be sacked. She also said that she did not know why she was sacked which was a lie.

      Posted by justice | April 23, 2012, 17:02
      • Yea i think your right Justice, with a letter like that their was nothing else that can be done.

        Posted by blane | April 24, 2012, 03:10
  4. LMAO SANKY START TO SING NOW LMAO

    Posted by Jason | April 23, 2012, 13:54
  5. Where’s mr peter now? lol THIS WOMAN IS A NUT JOB,IF SHE BECOMES PM OF SVG THAT WILL BE THE DAY I MOVE ALL MY FAMILY OUT OF THERE LOL

    Posted by Jason | April 23, 2012, 14:16
  6. WE NAH TUN BACK!!!

    Posted by Jason | April 23, 2012, 14:23
  7. FOR THOSE WHO DON’T UNDERSTAND WHAT “WE NAH TUN BACK” MEANS.IT MEANS MOVING FORWARD AS A PROGRESSIVE AND UNITED NATION.IT MEANS NOT GOING IN REVERSE GEAR LIKE NDP HAD US UNDER FOR 17 YEARS.IF YOU CAN’T SEE THE PROGRESS THEN YOU EITHER BLIND OR JUST SIMPLY HATING.PEACE OUT.

    Posted by Jason | April 23, 2012, 14:27
    • “IT MEANS MOVING FORWARD AS A PROGRESSIVE AND UNITED NATION.IT MEANS NOT GOING IN REVERSE GEAR LIKE NDP HAD US UNDER FOR 17 YEARS”.That has got to be a joke, because no body with a right mind would say such a thing.Ok well please tell us all about this, imaginary progress that your talking about.

      Posted by blane | April 24, 2012, 03:08
  8. Anesia is clearly a hurt person. To bring up certain things about the party at this stage makes her look like a hypocrite. I pray that Anesia can find her way back to God soon. I know you are a beautiful person Anesia but let GOD, not religion, take control of you.

    Posted by justice | April 23, 2012, 17:06
  9. Jason, you are totally blind. You are blind just like all the others who follow because of the kickbacks and undeserved benefits. Poor Fool!

    Posted by L Sutton | April 23, 2012, 22:30
  10. “We Nah tun back” means we’re gonna sell more things to st.lucia and we wont stop till they own us,take a look at the pms economic policy and you’ll see the real nutjob.They came up with their economic plan,manfesto etc at the red roof inn ..Jason I was alive in Mitchell’s time,you ulp dumb_zz Mufus don’t know what progress is,neither does your pm. Actually if progress means that he pm got to enrich his closest friends and family using state funds,while losing state assets to st.lucia,creatng a billion dollar debt,then yeah we made progress… Dotish people never drove a car before,until they hijacked one in 2001,driving it in reverse for 10 years pressing the accelerator and the brake at the same time,engine falling apart,they almost out of gas,yet they shouting “we naah tun back”..keep telling yourselves that,maybe it will fix the car.In the meantime we’ll just watch and laugh, “watch how de dotish man haffu sell de bank and supermarket,ah way he go get money to pay workaz,you ever see somebody so dotish,watch de dotish man murdoooo”

    Posted by Joe | April 23, 2012, 23:10
  11. The supporters of the NDP have suddenly former Senator Anesia Baptiste. The once highly praised woman, who persons within the NDP referred to as “NDP’s claim to fame” or “Joan of Ark” or “Rosa Parks” for displaying rude, disrespectful and behavior unbecoming of a senior public servant is now under a serious attack by those who once professed their love and admirationfor her. members of the Upper party of the NDP amazingly chastised her rude and disrespectful behaviour to Arhnim Eustace. if Eustace and the NDP had condemned and not EMBRACED Anesia two years ago for her unpatriotic and disrespectful behavior and her disrespect for the authority of her Minister, the Services Commission and the Prime Minister the tragedy they now experience would not have been. The NDP used her in the NO VOTE and she used the NDP after the NO VOTE. Both instances are apalling and exposes the real weaknessess, hypocrisy, undemocratic nature and intolerance of the NDP, the two NDP and Anesia fit well together…

    Posted by Carl | April 24, 2012, 05:38
  12. Parliament will be more interesting Now L.L (linton Lewis) is in Da House http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vimZj8HW0Kg&ob=av2n he’s gonna knock ulp out cause Arnhim said knock ulp out

    Posted by Joe | April 24, 2012, 20:01
  13. I doubt anyone wil be accusing Arnhim of rape,or that he’d sell a bank or supermarket because there aren’t any,how much you want to be that Gonsalves will end up selling the NIS?

    Posted by Jahu | April 24, 2012, 20:12
  14. All I can do is laugh at these NDP clowns. lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol

    The NDP has to be the MOST HYPOCRITICAL and UNDEMOCRATIC MASS party that I have ever come across.

    I guess Daniel Cummings who STONED a CHURCH while PARISHIONERS were PRAISING GOD and who said that he would DO IT AGAIN is an upstanding ELECTED MEMBER of the NDP, but Anesia Baptiste who they PRAISED and DEFENDED during a time when she was brought up on charges for insubordination and breach of the SVG Public Servant’s Code of Conduct when employed as a senior civil servant in the Ministry of Tourism is now PUBLIC ENEMY number one in their eyes.

    Yes, the same Anesia who they said was TOO BRIGHT for the ULP; who they said was a STAR; who they selected to become a senator over more qualified and worthy candidates is now a pariah in the eyes of the NDP and their headless supporters.

    All I can do is laugh at this clown of a POLITICAL PARTY called the NDP. Lol lol lol lol lol lol lol

    Posted by VINCYPOWA | April 24, 2012, 23:52
  15. The idea that you and you alone can run this country,or that of all the vincentians alive today you are the most capable of running the country is lunacy regardless of whether it’s Ralph or Anesia or Arnhim that preaches it.GOD wants us all to be pm,but at the end of the day it’s a popularity contest like Miss SVG.Nobody in the history of this country has waited longer or tried harder to be pm than Ralph Gonsalves,man fought for it tooth and nail not against NDP against SVGLP,stalky boyea and co l.o.l Of all the people who were ever pm of SVG Ralph seems like the only one who might be willing to kill for it,the willingness to remain leader at all costs is why he’s pm,few vincentians are that desperate for power,it doesn’t matter who wants him to be pm whether GOD or Satan,all that matters is that he gets to be pm l.o.l Nether Arnhim nor Anesia can sink to that level or go down into the sewer to do battle with king Red Rat,so the rats continue eating down our country

    Posted by Jahu | April 25, 2012, 02:29

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Party policy on religion might have led to senator’s dismissal « I-Witness News - April 23, 2012

I-Witness News’ tweets

Archives

%d bloggers like this: